Austria

Optimizing Large Language Model (LLM) performance requires well-crafted prompts, but manual prompt engineering is labor-intensive and often ineffective. Automated prompt optimization techniques address this challenge but the major of them rely on randomly selected evaluation subsets, which fail to represent the full dataset, leading to unreliable evaluations and suboptimal prompts. Existing coreset selection methods, designed for LLM benchmarking, are unsuitable for prompt optimization due to challenges in clustering similar samples, high data collection costs, and the unavailability of performance data for new or private datasets. To overcome these issues, we propose IPOMP, an Iterative evaluation data selection approach for effective Prompt Optimization using real time Model Performance. IPOMP is a two-stage approach that selects representative and diverse samples using semantic clustering and boundary analysis, followed by iterative refinement with real-time model performance data to replace redundant samples. Evaluations on two datasets BIG-bench and LIAR, and two models GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o-mini, show that IPOMP improves effectiveness by at least 1.6% to 3.1%, and stability by at least 50% to 55.5% compared with the best baseline across the studied datasets and models, with minimal computational overhead below 1%. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that our real-time performance-guided refinement approach can be universally applied to enhance existing coreset selection methods.

ACL 2025

Model Performance-Guided Evaluation Data Selection for Effective Prompt Optimization

prompt optimization

data selection

evaluation

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

poster

As large language models advance toward superhuman performance, ensuring their alignment with human values and abilities grows increasingly complex. Weak-to-strong generalization offers a promising approach by leveraging predictions from weaker models to guide stronger systems, but its effectiveness could be constrained by the inherent noise and inaccuracies in these weak predictions. To address this, we propose a theoretically grounded approach that replaces forward KL divergence—whose mass-covering behavior risks overfitting to imperfect weak signals—with reverse KL divergence. Reverse KL divergence’s zero-forcing effect prioritizes high-confidence predictions, effectively mitigating the influence of unreliable weak supervision. Theoretically, we extend existing bounds and derive tighter lower bounds for both forward and reverse KL divergence. Notably, when a sufficiently pre-trained strong model is fine-tuned on the last linear layer, reverse KL guarantees that it outperforms its weak supervisor by the magnitude of their disagreement. Empirically, we demonstrate that reverse KL and reverse cross-entropy not only enable strong models to outperform those trained with forward KL and standard cross-entropy across most settings, but also exhibit greater robustness to noisy labels.

Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Generalization in Theory and Practice: Reverse KL vs. Forward KL

Due to the large number of parameters, the inference phase of Large Language Models (LLMs) is resource-intensive. Unlike traditional model compression, which needs retraining, recent dynamic computation methods show that not all components are required for inference, enabling a training-free pipeline.In this paper, we focus on the dynamic depth of LLM generation. A token-position aware layer skipping framework is proposed to save 1.5x times operations efficiently while maintaining performance.We first observed that tokens predicted later have lower perplexity and thus require less computation. Then, we propose a training-free algorithm called Position-Aware Depth Decay Decoding (), which leverages a power-law decay function, \left\lfloor L × (𝛼i) \right\rfloor, to determine the number of layers to retain when generating token Ti. Remarkably, without any retraining, the achieves success across a wide range of generation tasks for the first time.Experiments on large language models (the Llama) with 7 ∼ 70 billion parameters show that can achieve an average 1.5x speedup compared with the full-inference pipeline while maintaining comparable performance with nearly no performance drop (<1%) on the GSM8K and BBH benchmarks.

Position-Aware Depth Decay Decoding (D3): Boosting Large Language Model Inference Efficiency

Recent advancements in Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled the creation of highly realistic synthetic content, raising concerns about the potential for malicious use, such as misinformation and manipulation. Moreover, detecting Machine-Generated Text (MGT) remains challenging due to the lack of robust benchmarks that assess generalization to real-world scenarios. In this work, we evaluate the resilience of state-of-the-art MGT detectors (e.g., Mage, Radar, LLM-DetectAIve) to linguistically informed adversarial attacks. We develop a pipeline that fine-tunes language models using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to shift the MGT style toward human-written text (HWT), obtaining generations more challenging to detect by current models. Additionally, we analyze the linguistic shifts induced by the alignment and how detectors rely on "linguistic shortcuts" to detect texts. Our results show that detectors can be easily fooled with relatively few examples, resulting in a significant drop in detecting performances. This highlights the importance of improving detection methods and making them robust to unseen in-domain texts. We release code, models, and data to support future research on more robust MGT detection benchmarks.

Stress-testing Machine Generated Text Detection: Shifting Language Models Writing Style to Fool Detectors

Simultaneous translation of unbounded streaming speech remains a challenging problem due to the need for effectively processing the history speech context and past translations so that quality and latency, including computation overhead, can be balanced. Most prior works assume pre-segmented speech, limiting their real-world applicability. In this paper, we propose InfiniSST, a novel approach that formulates SST as a multi-turn dialogue task, enabling seamless translation of unbounded speech. We construct translation trajectories and robust segments from MuST-C with multi-latency augmentation during training and develop a key-value (KV) cache management strategy to facilitate efficient inference. Experiments on MuST-C En-Es, En-De, and En-Zh demonstrate that InfiniSST reduces computation-aware latency by 0.5 to 1 second while maintaining the same translation quality compared to baselines. Ablation studies further validate the contributions of our data construction and cache management strategy.

InfiniSST: Simultaneous Translation of Unbounded Speech with Large Language Model

The rapid advancement of vision-language models (VLMs) has brought a lot of attention to their safety alignment. However, existing methods have primarily focused on model undersafety, where the model responds to hazardous queries, while neglecting oversafety, where the model refuses to answer safe queries. In this paper, we introduce the concept of safety calibration, which systematically addresses both undersafety and oversafety. Specifically, we present VSCBench, a novel dataset of 3,600 image-text pairs that are visually or textually similar but differ in terms of safety, which is designed to evaluate safety calibration across image-centric and text-centric scenarios. Based on our benchmark, we evaluate safety calibration across eleven widely used VLMs. Our extensive experiments revealed major issues with both undersafety and oversafety. We further investigated four approaches to improve the model's safety calibration. We found that even though some methods effectively calibrated the models' safety problems, these methods also lead to the degradation of models' utility. This trade-off underscores the urgent need for advanced calibration methods, and our benchmark provides a valuable tool for evaluating future approaches.

VSCBench: Bridging the Gap in Vision-Language Model Safety Calibration

Recent advances in mathematical problem-solving with language models (LMs) integrate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and code execution to harness their complementary strengths. However, existing hybrid frameworks exhibit a critical limitation: they depend on externally dictated instructions or rigid code-integration templates, lacking metacognitive awareness—the capacity to dynamically evaluate intrinsic capabilities and autonomously determine when and how to integrate tools. This rigidity motivates our study of autonomous code integration, enabling models to adapt tool-usage strategies as their reasoning abilities evolve during training.

While reinforcement learning (RL) shows promise for boosting LLM reasoning at scale (e.g., DeepSeek-R1), we demonstrate its inefficiency in learning autonomous code integration due to inadequate exploration of the vast combinatorial space of CoT-code interleaving patterns. To address this challenge, we propose a novel Expectation-Maximization (EM) framework that synergizes structured exploration (E-step) with off-policy RL optimization (M-step), creating a self-reinforcing cycle between metacognitive tool-use decisions and evolving capabilities. Experiments reveal our method achieves superior results through improved exploration. Notably, our 7B model improves over 11% on MATH500 and 9.4% on AIME without o1-like CoT.

Learning Autnomous Code Integration for Math Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) often succumb to adversarial prompts, a phenomenon popularly known as ``jailbreaking.'' While jailbreaking primarily targets short-term noncompliance with predefined policies, we argue that a deeper vulnerability lies in altering an LLM's \emph{fundamental axiomatic beliefs}, such as mathematical or philosophical truths. In this work, we introduce \textsc{GoodLiar}, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based framework that generates deceptive contexts to systematically \emph{rewrite} an LLM's core logical or philosophical understandings. By incentivizing an RL agent to produce persuasive and coherent arguments, \textsc{GoodLiar} aims to induce \emph{persistent} belief shifts, rather than merely influencing immediate judgments of factual truthfulness. %rather than one-off policy breaches. Our approach introduces \emph{DA-ILQL}, a novel offline RL method that extends ILQL by integrating on-policy data and language exploration to enhance the language discovery and optimization. Through extensive evaluations on multiple LLMs, we show that deceptive contexts discovered by \textsc{GoodLiar} consistently outperform simple multi-turn prompting methods.

GOODLIAR: A Reinforcement Learning-Based Deceptive Agent for Disrupting LLM Beliefs on Foundational Principles

Large language models are widely used for long-form text generation, but factual errors existing in responses would undermine their reliability. In this work, we systematically investigate the impact of response length on factual precision. First, we introduce an automatic and bi-level long-form factuality evaluation method, which achieves high agreement with human annotations while being cost-effective. Using this framework, we conduct controlled experiments and find that longer responses exhibit lower factual precision, confirming the existence of length bias in long-form factuality. To understand the underlying causes, we empirically examine three hypotheses: error propagation, long context, and facts exhaustion. Our findings reveal that facts exhaustion, where the model gradually exhausts more reliable knowledge, is the primary cause of factual degradation, rather than the other two hypotheses. Our study provides new insights into LLM factuality degradation in extended outputs and suggests future directions for improving long-form factual accuracy.

How Does Generation Length Affect Long-Form Factuality

Stance detection, which aims to identify public opinion towards specific targets using social media data, is an important yet challenging task. With the increasing number of online debates among social media users, conversational stance detection has become a crucial research area. However, existing conversational stance detection datasets are restricted to a limited set of specific targets, which constrains the effectiveness of stance detection models when encountering a large number of unseen targets in real-world applications. To bridge this gap, we manually curate a large-scale, high-quality zero-shot conversational stance detection dataset, named ZS-CSD, comprising 280 targets across two distinct target types. Leveraging the ZS-CSD dataset, we propose SITPCL, a speaker interaction and target-aware prototypical contrastive learning model, and establish the benchmark performance in the zero-shot setting. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed SITPCL model achieves state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot conversational stance detection. Notably, the SITPCL model attains only an F1-macro score of 43.81%, highlighting the persistent challenges in zero-shot conversational stance detection.

Zero-Shot Conversational Stance Detection: Dataset and Approaches

Claim verification is a critical task in natural language processing (NLP) that involves determining whether available evidence supports or refutes a given claim. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in this domain, they still face significant challenges, especially when handling domain-specific knowledge. We propose to enhance LLM-based claim verification through a novel step-by-stepsynthetic data generation framework SynthVerify. Our key insight is that synthetic data generation, guided by domain-specific claim patterns and evidence plans, can effectively address LLMs' knowledge gaps in specialized fields. Using our proposed framework, we create a domain-diverse synthetic claim verification dataset for training zero-shot verification models. We evaluated the fine-tuned LLMs across multiple specialized domains and demonstrate substantial performance gains in verification accuracy compared to the original LLMs, achieving a 20.1 point improvement on the Llama-3-8B model. Our results show that systematically generated synthetic data can effectively address the limitations of current LLM-based verification systems, particularly in handling domain-specific knowledge tasks.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Generalization in Theory and Practice: Reverse KL vs. Forward KL

Similar lecture

Bandit-Based Prompt Design Strategy Selection Improves Prompt Optimizers