Austria

Knowledge editing methods like MEMIT are able to make data and compute efficient updates of factual knowledge by using a single sentence to update facts and their consequences. However, what is often overlooked is a ``precomputation step&#39;&#39;, which requires a one-time but significant computational cost. The authors of MEMIT \cite{MEMIT} originally precompute approximately 44 million hidden vectors per edited layer, which requires a forward pass over 44 million tokens. For GPT-J (6B), this precomputation step takes 36 hours on a single GPU, while it takes approximately 40 hours for Llama2-7B. Additionally, this precomputation time grows with model size. In this paper, we show that this excessive computational cost is unnecessary. Knowledge editing using MEMIT and related methods, such as ROME and EMMET, can be performed by pre-computing a very small portion of the 44 million hidden vectors. We first present the theoretical minimum number of hidden vector precomputation required for solutions of these editing methods to exist. We then empirically show that knowledge editing using these methods can be done by pre-computing significantly fewer hidden vectors. Specifically, we show that the precomputation step can be done with less than 0.3% of the originally stipulated number of hidden vectors. This saves a significant amount of precomputation time and allows users to begin editing new models within a few minutes.

ACL 2025

Efficient Knowledge Editing via Minimal Precomputation

efficient precomputation

knowledge editing

interpretability

### Welcome!
The 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024) will take place in Bangkok, Thailand from August 11th to 16th, 2024. Our Virtual Poster Sessions will take place online Thursday, August 22, 2024.

You are required to register for this event. **Please register [here](https://2024.aclweb.org/registration). **

If you have already registered, please check your inbox for an email from Underline granting you access to ACL 2024 content.

Please register!

ACL 2024

The 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2024) will take place in Bangkok, Thailand from August 11th to 16th, 2024. More information will be announced soon.

Knowledge editing methods like MEMIT are able to make data and compute efficient updates of factual knowledge by using a single sentence to update facts and their consequences. However, what is often overlooked is a ``precomputation step'', which requires a one-time but significant computational cost. The authors of MEMIT \cite{MEMIT} originally precompute approximately 44 million hidden vectors per edited layer, which requires a forward pass over 44 million tokens. For GPT-J (6B), this precomputation step takes 36 hours on a single GPU, while it takes approximately 40 hours for Llama2-7B. Additionally, this precomputation time grows with model size. In this paper, we show that this excessive computational cost is unnecessary. Knowledge editing using MEMIT and related methods, such as ROME and EMMET, can be performed by pre-computing a very small portion of the 44 million hidden vectors. We first present the theoretical minimum number of hidden vector precomputation required for solutions of these editing methods to exist. We then empirically show that knowledge editing using these methods can be done by pre-computing significantly fewer hidden vectors. Specifically, we show that the precomputation step can be done with less than 0.3% of the originally stipulated number of hidden vectors. This saves a significant amount of precomputation time and allows users to begin editing new models within a few minutes.

technical paper

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Vision-language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general-purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems. Such models have been shown to be highly capable, but, at the same time, lacking some basic visual understanding skills. In this paper, we set out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks (object classification, spatial understanding, and ability to delineate individual object instances through counting), by constructing a series of tests that probe which components of design, specifically, may be lacking. Importantly, we go significantly beyond the current benchmarks, which simply measure the final performance of VLM response, by also comparing and contrasting it to the performance of probes trained directly on features obtained from the visual encoder, intermediate vision-language projection and LLM-decoder output. In doing so, we uncover shortcomings in VLMs and make a number of important observations about their capabilities, robustness and how they process visual information. We hope our insights will guide progress in further improving VLMs.

Response Wide Shut:Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities

Post-training of Large Language Models often involves a pipeline of Supervised Finetuning (SFT) followed by Preference Finetuning (PFT) using methods like Direct Preference Optimization. Both stages require annotated data that are very different in structure and costs. We study how to optimally allocate a fixed training data budget between the two stages, through extensive experiments spanning four diverse tasks, multiple model sizes and various data annotation costs. Our findings reveal that just SFT on the base model dominates performance in low-data regimes ($<1,000$ annotated examples). With larger data-budgets, we observe that a combination of SFT and PFT, often with increasing portions allocated towards preference data yields optimal performance. However, completely eliminating SFT and running PFT directly on the base model yields suboptimal performance, described as the cold start problem on tasks like mathematics. We observe that this is due to the distribution shift arising from using DPO directly on the base model to elicit step-by-step reasoning. This limitation can be effectively addressed by allocating even a small portion ($<10$\%) of the budget to SFT first, resulting in performance improvements of $15-20$\% on analytical benchmarks like GSM8k. These results provide actionable insights for researchers and practitioners optimizing model development under budget constraints, where high-quality data curation often represents a significant portion of the total costs of model development.

Balancing the Budget: Understanding Trade-offs Between Supervised and Preference-Based Finetuning

When completing knowledge-intensive tasks, humans sometimes need an answer and a corresponding reference passage for auxiliary reading. Previous methods required obtaining pre-segmented article chunks through additional retrieval models. This paper explores leveraging the parameterized knowledge stored during the pre-training phase of large language models (LLMs) to recall reference passage from any starting position independently. We propose a two-stage framework that simulates the scenario of humans recalling easily forgotten references. Initially, the LLM is prompted to recall document title identifiers to obtain a coarse-grained document set. Then, based on the acquired coarse-grained document set, it recalls fine-grained passage. In the two-stage recall process, we use constrained decoding to ensure that content outside of the stored documents is not generated. To increase speed, we only recall a short prefix in the second stage, and then locate its position to retrieve a complete passage. Experiments on KILT knowledge-sensitive tasks have verified that LLMs can independently recall reference passage locations in various task forms, and the obtained reference significantly assists downstream tasks.

MindRef: Mimicking Human Memory for Hierarchical Reference Retrieval with Fine-Grained Location Awareness

With the rapid adoption of LLM-based chat-bots, there is a pressing need to evaluate what humans and LLMs can achieve together. However, standard benchmarks, such as MMLU, measure LLM capabilities in isolation (i.e., “AI-alone”). Here, we design and conduct a user study to convert MMLU questions into user-AI conversations, by seeding the user with the question and having them carry out a conversation with the LLM to answer their question. We release ChatBench, a new dataset with AI-alone, user-alone, and user-AI data for 396 questions and two LLMs, including 144K answers and 7,336 user-AI conversations. We find that AI-alone accuracy fails to predict user-AI accuracy, with significant differences across multiple subjects (math, physics, and moral reasoning), and we analyze the user-AI conversations to provide insight into how they diverge from AI-alone benchmarks. Finally, we show that fine-tuning a user simulator on a subset of ChatBench improves its ability to estimate user-AI accuracies, increasing correlation on held-out questions by more than 20 points, creating possibilities for scaling interactive evaluation.

ChatBench: From Static Benchmarks to Human-AI Evaluation

We believe that analyzing attention is crucial for understanding bias in large language models (LLMs); in ambiguous comparative prompting frameworks, it provides insight into how the LLM distributes its focus across different entities, and how this contributes to biased decisions. To this end, we first introduce a metric to quantify the "entity preference'' of an LLM. We then propose $\textbf{ATLAS}$, a technique to localize bias to specific layers of the LLM by analyzing attention scores and then reduce bias by scaling attention in these biased layers. To evaluate our method, we conduct extensive experiments across 3 datasets, 4 models, and 4 baseline approaches. Our experiments demonstrate that bias is concentrated in the later layers, typically around the last third. We also show how $\textbf{ATLAS}$ effectively mitigates bias through targeted interventions without compromising downstream performance and an average increase of only 0.34% in perplexity when the intervention is applied. We see an average improvement of 0.28 points in the bias score across all the datasets.

Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in recommender systems for Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction requires a careful balance between computational efficiency and predictive accuracy. This paper introduces OptiRAG-Rec, a comprehensive framework that integrates Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with a novel multi-head early exit architecture to address both challenges. By leveraging Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) as efficient retrieval mechanisms, the framework significantly reduces data retrieval times while maintaining high model performance. Additionally, the multi-head early exit strategy dynamically terminates inference based on real-time predictive confidence assessments, enhancing responsiveness without sacrificing accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that OptiRAG-Rec reduces computation time while preserving the precision required for reliable recommendations, establishing a new benchmark for efficient and accurate LLM deployment in recommendation.

The Efficiency vs. Accuracy Trade-off: Optimizing RAG-Enhanced LLM Recommender Systems Using Multi-Head Early Exit

Fine-tuning large language models (LMs) for individual tasks yields strong performance but is expensive for deployment and storage. Recent works explore model merging to combine multiple task-specific models into a single multi-task model without additional training. However, existing merging methods often fail for models fine-tuned with low-rank adaptation (LoRA), due to significant performance degradation. In this paper, we show that this issue arises from a previously overlooked interplay between model parameters and data distributions. We propose **O**rthogonal **S**ubspaces for **R**obust model **M**erging (**OSRM**) to constrain the LoRA subspace *prior* to fine-tuning, ensuring that updates relevant to one task do not adversely shift outputs for others. Our approach can seamlessly integrate with most existing merging algorithms, reducing the unintended interference among tasks. Extensive experiments on eight datasets, tested with three widely used LMs and two large LMs, demonstrate that our method not only boosts merging performance but also preserves single-task accuracy. Furthermore, our approach exhibits greater robustness to the hyperparameters of merging. These results highlight the importance of data-parameter interaction in model merging and offer a plug-and-play solution for merging LoRA models.

Unraveling LoRA Interference: Orthogonal Subspaces for Robust Model Merging

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in single-turn question answering (QA) on short-text. However, their performance significantly declines when applied to multi-turn QA over extra-long context (ELC), as they struggle to capture the logical correlations across multiple chunks of ELC and maintain the coherence of multi-turn Questions. To address the challenges, we propose the CSTree-SRI framework (Cognitive Semantic Tree through Summarization, Retrieval, and Introspection). CSTree-SRI dynamically constructs the CSTree to preserve logical coherence within ELC through hierarchical synthesis and introspective validation. Then a logic-driven traversal strategy on CSTree is designed to provide efficient information retrieval for question answering. Additionally, we construct a suite of multi-turn QA datasets and an evaluation benchmark tailored for ELC tasks, and comprehensive experiments demonstrate the framework's superiority in addressing the challenges of multi-turn QA over ELC.

CSTree-SRI: Introspection-Driven Cognitive Semantic Tree for Multi-Turn Question Answering over Extra-Long Contexts

The reasoning steps generated by LLMs might be incomplete, as they mimic logical leaps common in everyday communication found in their pre-training data: underlying rationales are frequently left implicit (unstated). To address this challenge, we introduce RATIONALYST, a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pre-training on a vast collection of rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. We extract 79k rationales from web-scale unlabelled dataset (the Pile) and a combination of reasoning datasets with minimal human intervention. This web-scale pre-training for reasoning allows RATIONALYST to consistently generalize across diverse reasoning tasks, including mathematical, commonsense, scientific, and logical reasoning. Fine-tuned from LLaMa-3-8B, RATIONALYST improves the accuracy of reasoning by an average of 3.9% on 7 representative reasoning benchmarks. It also demonstrates superior performance compared to significantly larger verifiers like GPT-4 and similarly sized models fine-tuned on matching training sets.

RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning

Recent studies have explored Continual Instruction Tuning (CIT) in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), with a primary focus on Task-incremental CIT, where MLLMs are required to continuously acquire new tasks. However, the more practical and challenging Domain-incremental CIT, focused on the continual adaptation of MLLMs to new domains, remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose a new Sparse Mixture of Expert (SMoE) based method for domain-incremental CIT in MLLMs. During training, we learn a domain-specific SMoE module for each new domain in every FFN sub-layer of MLLMs, preventing catastrophic forgetting caused by inter-domain conflicts. Moreover, we equip the SMoE module with a domain-specific autoregressive loss (DSAL), which is used to identify the most suitable SMoE module for processing each test instruction during inference. To further enhance the SMoE module's ability to learn domain knowledge, we design an adaptive threshold-based router (AT-Router) that allocates computing resources (experts) to instruction tokens based on their importance. Finally, we establish a new benchmark to evaluate the efficacy of our method and advance future research. Extensive experiments show that our method consistently outperforms all competitive baselines.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Response Wide Shut:Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities

Similar lecture

Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgetting