Austria

Multi-agent systems, where specialized agents collaborate to solve a shared task hold great potential, from increased modularity to simulating complex environments. However, they also have a major caveat -- a single agent can cause the entire system to fail. Consider a simple game where the knowledge to solve the task is distributed between agents, which share information in a communication channel. At each round, any of the agents can terminate the game and make the final prediction, even if they are uncertain about the outcome of their action. Detection of such rogue agents __before they act__ may prevent the system&#39;s failure. In this work, we propose to __monitor__ agents during action prediction and __intervene__ when a future error is likely to occur. To test our approach, we introduce WhoDunitEnv, a multi-agent collaboration environment that allows modular control over task complexity and communication structure. Experiments on WhoDunitEnv, code generation tasks and the GovSim environment for resource sustainability show that our approach leads to substantial performance gains up to 17.4\%, 2.5\% and 20\%, respectively. Thorough analysis shows that our monitors successfully identify critical points of agent confusion and our interventions effectively stop agent errors from propagating.

ACL 2025

Preventing Rogue Agents Improves Multi-Agent Collaboration

AAMAS is the leading scientific conference for research in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 as the merging of three respected scientific meetings: the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), and the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA). The aim of the joint conference is to provide a single, high-profile, internationally-respected archival forum for scientific research in the theory and practice of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems.

Browse keynotes, discussions, panels and over 300 presentations.


AAMAS 2020

AAMAS is the leading scientific conference for research in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. The AAMAS conference series was initiated in 2002 as the merging of three respected scientific meetings: the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS), the International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), and the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA). 

Multi-agent systems, where specialized agents collaborate to solve a shared task hold great potential, from increased modularity to simulating complex environments. However, they also have a major caveat -- a single agent can cause the entire system to fail. Consider a simple game where the knowledge to solve the task is distributed between agents, which share information in a communication channel. At each round, any of the agents can terminate the game and make the final prediction, even if they are uncertain about the outcome of their action. Detection of such rogue agents __before they act__ may prevent the system's failure. In this work, we propose to __monitor__ agents during action prediction and __intervene__ when a future error is likely to occur. To test our approach, we introduce WhoDunitEnv, a multi-agent collaboration environment that allows modular control over task complexity and communication structure. Experiments on WhoDunitEnv, code generation tasks and the GovSim environment for resource sustainability show that our approach leads to substantial performance gains up to 17.4\%, 2.5\% and 20\%, respectively. Thorough analysis shows that our monitors successfully identify critical points of agent confusion and our interventions effectively stop agent errors from propagating.

workshop paper

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

This paper finds that agentic AI systems intensify existing challenges to traditional public sector oversight mechanisms --- which rely on siloed compliance units and episodic approvals rather than continuous, integrated supervision. We identify five governance dimensions essential for responsible agent deployment: cross-departmental implementation, comprehensive evaluation, enhanced security protocols, operational visibility, and systematic auditing. We evaluate the capacity of existing oversight structures to meet these challenges, via a mixed-methods approach consisting of a literature review and interviews with civil servants in AI-related roles. We find that agent oversight poses intensified versions of three existing governance challenges: continuous oversight, deeper integration of governance and operational capabilities, and interdepartmental coordination. We propose approaches that both adapt institutional mechanisms and design agent architectures compatible with public sector constraints.

Oversight Structures for Agentic AI in Public-Sector Organizations

Highlight summarization in baseball requires balancing statistical analysis with narrative coherence. Traditional approaches—such as Win Probability Added (WPA)-based ranking or computer vision-driven event detection—can identify scoring plays but often miss strategic depth, momentum shifts, and storyline progression. Manual curation remains the gold standard but is resource-intensive and not scalable. We introduce $\textbf{DIAMOND}$, an $\textbf{LLM-driven agent for context-aware baseball highlight summarization}$ that integrates $\textbf{structured sports analytics with natural language reasoning}$. DIAMOND leverages sabermetric features—Win Expectancy, WPA, and Leverage Index—to quantify play importance, while an LLM module enhances selection based on contextual narrative value. This hybrid approach ensures both $\textbf{quantitative rigor and qualitative richness}$, surpassing the limitations of purely statistical or vision-based systems. Evaluated on five diverse Korean Baseball Organization League games, DIAMOND improves F1-score from 42.9\% (WPA-only) to 84.8\%, outperforming both commercial and statistical baselines. Though limited in scale, our results highlight the potential of modular, interpretable agent-based frameworks for event-level summarization in sports and beyond.

DIAMOND: An LLM-Driven Agent for Context-Aware Baseball Highlight Summarization

We introduce AgentAda, the first LLM-powered analytics agent capable of learning and applying new data analytics skills to generate more specialized and insightful analyses. Unlike existing systems that require users to manually select analytical methods, AgentAda automatically identifies the most suitable technique from a curated library of skills. This enables it to perform complex tasks—such as clustering, predictive modeling, and BERT-based NLP analysis—that standard LLMs cannot execute on their own. AgentAda’s dataset-to-insight pipeline consists of three main steps: (I) a question generator that formulates queries based on the user’s goal and persona, (II) a hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based skill matcher that selects the most relevant skill, and (III) a code generator that uses the retrieved skill's documentation to produce executable code for uncovering patterns and trends. To evaluate AgentAda, we introduce KaggleBench, a benchmark of curated notebooks spanning diverse domains. Human evaluations show that AgentAda delivers more insightful analytics than unskilled agents, with 48.78% of users preferring its outputs compared to 27.67% for the baseline. We also propose a scalable LLM-as-a-judge evaluation framework, which we validate by demonstrating strong alignment with human judgments.

AgentAda: Skill-Adaptive Data Analytics for Tailored Insight Discovery

Temporal progression is an integral part of knowledge accumulation and update. Web search is frequently adopted as the grounding for agent knowledge, yet an improper configuration affects the quality of the agent's responses. Here, we assess the agent behavior using distinct date-controlled tools (DCTs) as a stress test to measure the knowledge variability of large language model (LLM) agents. We demonstrate the temporal effects of an LLM agent as a writing assistant, which uses web search to complete scientific publication abstracts. We show that the temporality of search engines translates into tool-dependent agent performance but can be alleviated with base model choice and explicit reasoning instructions such as chain-of-thought prompting. Our results indicate that agent design and evaluations should take a dynamical view and implement effective measures to account for the temporal influence of external resources to improve agent reliability.

Measuring temporal effects of agent knowledge by date-controlled tool use

Event forecasting is a challenging task that requires temporal reasoning over historical data. Although iterative reasoning agents following the ReAct paradigm bring improvements to event forecasting tasks, they also increase the cost of each prediction and bring challenges in tracing the information that contributes to the prediction. In this study, we simplify the ReAct framework into a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline. Surprisingly, the RAG outperforms ReAct with only 10\% of the token costs. Furthermore, our experiments reveal that structured statistical contexts significantly enhance forecasting accuracy, whereas introducing unstructured semantic information (e.g., news article titles) negatively impacts performance. In-depth analyses further highlight that the iterative reasoning traces impair forecasting accuracy in smaller-scale models but benefit larger models (e.g., 70B) in the event forecasting task. These insights underscore existing limitations in large language models' temporal and semantic reasoning abilities, providing critical guidance for developing more cost-effective and reliable forecasting systems.

The Power of Simplicity in LLM-Based Event Forecasting

We present an agentic framework, Thinker, which achieves state of art performance in challenging reasoning tasks for realistic customer service scenarios that involve complex business logic and human interactions via long horizons. On the $\tau$-bench retail dataset, Thinker achieves 82.6\% success rate with GPT-4o (version 2024-06-01) (baseline: 68.3\%), and 81.9\% success rate with Llama-3.1 405B (baseline: 49.6\%), without any fine-tuning. Thinker effectively closes the gap in reasoning capabilities between the base models by introducing proper structure. The key features of the Thinker framework are: (1) State-Machine Augmented Generation (SMAG), which represents business logic as state machines and the LLM uses state machines as tools. (2) Delegation of tasks from the main reasoning loop to LLM-powered tools. (3) Adaptive context management. Our prompting-only solution achieves signficant gains, while still maintaining a simple and standard agentic architecture with a ReAct style reasoning loop. The key is to innovate on the tool interface design, as exemplified by SMAG and the LLM-powered tools.

The Art of Tool Interface Design

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various tasks, yet their potential to reason about and construct scientific methodologies remains under explored. This work introduces a novel benchmark evaluating LLMs' capacity to predict methodological details in AI research papers. We construct a dataset of 88 papers with redacted methodology sections and zero-shot prompt several state-of-the-art LLMs to generate methodology predictions. Our evaluation framework then employs a LLM-as-judge system with multiple LLM judges, majority voting, and self-omission techniques to minimize biases. We validate our LLM judge scores against human judgments. We then briefly analyze the judging results of our zero-shot prediction pipeline, suggesting that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle with the task of methodology generation without more advanced techniques. This benchmark lays the groundwork for future research into evaluating LLMs' potential for aiding in AI research.

FrontierScience Bench: Evaluating AI Research Capabilities in LLMs

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly enhanced the capabilities of agents across various tasks. However, existing agentic systems, whether based on fixed pipeline algorithms or pre-defined meta-learning frameworks, cannot search the whole agent design space due to the restriction of human-designed components, and thus might miss the more optimal agent design. In this paper, we introduce Gödel Agent, a self-evolving framework inspired by the \godel machine, enabling agents to recursively improve themselves without relying on predefined routines or fixed optimization algorithms. Gödel Agent leverages LLMs to dynamically modify its own logic and behavior, guided solely by high-level objectives through prompting. Experimental results on multiple domains demonstrate that implementation of Gödel Agent can achieve continuous self-improvement, surpassing manually crafted agents in performance, efficiency, and generalizability.

Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursively Self-Improvement

We present a scalable pipeline for automatically generating high-quality training data for web agents. In particular, a major challenge in identifying high-quality training instances is trajectory evaluation - quantifying how much progress was made towards task completion. We introduce a novel constraint-based evaluation framework that provides fine-grained assessment of progress towards task completion. This enables us to leverage partially successful trajectories, which significantly expands the amount of usable training data. We evaluate our method on a new benchmark we propose called BookingArena, which consists of complex booking tasks across 20 popular websites, and demonstrate that our distilled student model outperforms open-source approaches and matches or exceeds commercial systems, while being a significantly smaller model. Our work addresses the challenge of efficiently creating diverse, realistic web interaction datasets and provides a systematic evaluation methodology for complex structured web tasks.

Scaling Web Agent Training through Automatic Data Generation and Fine-grained Evaluation

This study proposes VisTRA (Visual Tool-use Reasoning Analyzer), a framework for analyzing how Visual Language Models (VLMs) utilize tools in VQA tasks involving small objects in high-resolution images. While tools like object detection and zoom functionality are essential for small object VQA, their potential errors necessitate careful verification of outputs. Our framework provides systematic evaluation of VLMs' tool-use capabilities through analysis of verification patterns. Using the V* bench dataset, we find that direct acceptance of tool outputs correlates with decreased VQA accuracy, while lower-performing models exhibit higher frequencies of cyclic verification loops. These findings offer insights for improving tool verification mechanisms in VLM architectures focused on small object detection tasks.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Oversight Structures for Agentic AI in Public-Sector Organizations

Similar lecture

Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents