China

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in open-ended visual question answering, they remain vulnerable to hallucinations. These are outputs that contradict or misrepresent input semantics, posing a critical challenge to the reliability and factual consistency. Existing methods often rely on external verification or post-hoc correction, lacking an internal mechanism to validate outputs directly during training. To bridge this gap, we propose ReLoop, a unified closed-loop training framework that encourages multimodal consistency for cross-modal understanding in MLLMs. ReLoop adopts a ring-shaped structure that integrates three complementary consistency feedback mechanisms, obliging MLLMs to &quot;seeing twice and thinking backwards&quot;. Specifically, ReLoop employs the frozen Consistency Feedback Plugin (CFP), comprising semantic reconstruction, visual description, and an attention supervision module for attention alignment. These components collectively enforce semantic reversibility, visual consistency, and interpretable attention, enabling the model to correct its outputs during training. Extensive evaluations and analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of ReLoop in reducing hallucination rates across multiple benchmarks, establishing a robust method for hallucination mitigation in MLLMs. We will release our source code and data in the camera-ready version.

EMNLP 2025

ReLoop: &quot;Seeing Twice and Thinking Backwards&quot; via Closed-loop Training to Mitigate Hallucinations in Multimodal understanding

multimodal hallucination mitigation; cross-modal consistency; self-verification training; closed-loop training.

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in open-ended visual question answering, they remain vulnerable to hallucinations. These are outputs that contradict or misrepresent input semantics, posing a critical challenge to the reliability and factual consistency. Existing methods often rely on external verification or post-hoc correction, lacking an internal mechanism to validate outputs directly during training. To bridge this gap, we propose ReLoop, a unified closed-loop training framework that encourages multimodal consistency for cross-modal understanding in MLLMs. ReLoop adopts a ring-shaped structure that integrates three complementary consistency feedback mechanisms, obliging MLLMs to "seeing twice and thinking backwards". Specifically, ReLoop employs the frozen Consistency Feedback Plugin (CFP), comprising semantic reconstruction, visual description, and an attention supervision module for attention alignment. These components collectively enforce semantic reversibility, visual consistency, and interpretable attention, enabling the model to correct its outputs during training. Extensive evaluations and analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of ReLoop in reducing hallucination rates across multiple benchmarks, establishing a robust method for hallucination mitigation in MLLMs. We will release our source code and data in the camera-ready version.

ReLoop: "Seeing Twice and Thinking Backwards" via Closed-loop Training to Mitigate Hallucinations in Multimodal understanding

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, including in financial question answering (FQA). However, the performance in FQA remains limited, particularly in questions that require deep financial knowledge and complex numerical reasoning. While supervised fine-tuning and closed-source LLMs have shown promise, they are often constrained by high costs or computational inefficiency. In this paper, we propose a low-cost yet effective framework, named FinMAN (Financial multi-agent framework), that enables small LLMs (e.g., 8B) to perform complex reasoning tasks without relying on expensive models or task-specific fine-tuning. FinMAN improves formula selection, extraction, and calculation to help small-scale models solve FQA tasks more accurately, with a lightweight verification mechanism to correct common errors. Experimental results show that FinMAN outperforms the best open-source model on BizBench by 10.46% and achieves competitive performance to GPT-3.5 using significantly fewer parameters. Our code and data are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MultiAgentFin-EE42.

David vs. Goliath: Cost-Efficient Financial QA via Cascaded Multi-Agent Reasoning

LLM search methods, such as Chain of Thought (CoT) and Tree of Thought (ToT), enhance LLM reasoning by exploring multiple reasoning paths. When combined with search algorithms like MCTS and Bandit methods, their effectiveness relies heavily on uncertainty estimation to prioritize paths that align with specific search objectives. \emph{However, it remains unclear whether existing LLM uncertainty metrics adequately capture the diverse types of uncertainty required to guide different search objectives.} In this work, we introduce a framework for uncertainty benchmarking, identifying four distinct uncertainty types: Answer, Correctness, Aleatoric, and Epistemic Uncertainty. Each type serves different optimization goals in search. Our experiments demonstrate that current metrics often align with only a subset of these uncertainty types, limiting their effectiveness for objective-aligned search in some cases. These findings highlight the need for additional target-aware uncertainty estimators that can adapt to various optimization goals in LLM search. Code is available at \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Benchmarking-Uncertainty-Metrics-for-LLM-Sampling-Search-4AAC/README.md}{link}.

Benchmarking Uncertainty Metrics for LLM Target-Aware Search

Proteins are central to biological systems, participating as building blocks across all forms of life. Despite advancements in understanding protein functions through protein sequence analysis, there remains potential for further exploration in integrating protein structural information. We argue that the structural information of proteins is not only limited to their 3D information but also encompasses information from amino acid molecules (local information) to protein-protein structure similarity (global information). To address this, we propose GLProtein, the first framework in protein pre-training that incorporates both global structural similarity and local amino acid details to enhance prediction accuracy and functional insights. GLProtein innovatively combines protein-masked modelling with triplet structure similarity scoring, protein 3D distance encoding and substructure-based amino acid molecule encoding. Experimental results demonstrate that GLProtein outperforms previous methods in several bioinformatics tasks, including predicting protein-protein interactions, contact prediction, and so on.

GLProtein: Global-and-Local Structure Aware Protein Representation Learning

Predicting drug-target interaction (DTI) is critical in the drug discovery process. Despite remarkable advances in recent DTI models through the integration of representations from diverse drug and target encoders, such models often struggle to capture the fine-grained interactions between drugs and protein, i.e. the binding of specific drug atoms (or substructures) and key amino acids of proteins, which is crucial for understanding the binding mechanisms and optimising drug design. To address this issue, this paper introduces a novel model, called FusionDTI, which uses a token-level **Fusion** module to effectively learn fine-grained information for **D**rug-**T**arget **I**nteraction. In particular, our FusionDTI model uses the SELFIES representation of drugs to mitigate sequence fragment invalidation and incorporates the structure-aware (SA) vocabulary of target proteins to address the limitation of amino acid sequences in structural information, additionally leveraging pre-trained language models extensively trained on large-scale biomedical datasets as encoders to capture the complex information of drugs and targets. Experiments on three well-known benchmark datasets show that our proposed FusionDTI model achieves the best performance in DTI prediction compared with eight existing state-of-the-art baselines. Furthermore, our case study indicates that FusionDTI could highlight the potential binding sites, enhancing the explainability of the DTI prediction.

FusionDTI: Fine-grained Binding Discovery with Token-level Fusion for Drug-Target Interaction

Cognitive biases, well studied in humans, can also be observed in LLMs, affecting their reliability in real-world applications. This paper investigates the anchoring effect in LLM-driven price negotiations. To this end, we instructed seller LLM agents to apply the anchoring effect and evaluated negotiations using not only an objective metric but also a subjective metric. Experimental results show that LLMs are influenced by the anchoring effect like humans. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the anchoring effect and factors such as reasoning and personality. It was shown that reasoning models are less prone to the anchoring effect, suggesting that the long chain of thought mitigates the effect. However, we found no significant correlation between personality traits and susceptibility to the anchoring effect. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of cognitive biases in LLMs and to the realization of safe and responsible application of LLMs in society.

How Does Cognitive Bias Affect Large Language Models? A Case Study on the Anchoring Effect in Price Negotiation Simulations

With the development of technology, large language models (LLMs) have dominated the downstream natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, because of the LLMs' instruction-following abilities and inability to distinguish the instructions in the data content, such as web pages from search engines, the LLMs are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. These attacks trick the LLMs into deviating from the original input instruction and executing the attackers' target instruction. Recently, various instruction hierarchy defense strategies are proposed to effectively defend against prompt injection attacks via fine-tuning. In this paper, we explore more vicious attacks that nullify the prompt injection defense methods, even the instruction hierarchy: backdoor-powered prompt injection attacks, where the attackers utilize the backdoor attack for prompt injection attack purposes. Specifically, the attackers poison the supervised fine-tuning samples and insert the backdoor into the model. Once the trigger is activated, the backdoored model executes the injected instruction surrounded by the trigger. We construct a benchmark for comprehensive evaluation. Our experiments demonstrate that backdoor-powered prompt injection attacks are more harmful than previous prompt injection attacks, nullifying existing prompt injection defense methods, even the instruction hierarchy techniques.

Backdoor-Powered Prompt Injection Attacks Nullify Defense Methods

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in feature engineering for tabular data, but concerns about their reliability persist, especially due to variability in generated outputs. We introduce a multi-level diagnosis and evaluation framework to assess the robustness of LLMs in feature engineering, focusing on identifying key variables, relationships, and decision boundaries for predicting target classes across diverse domains. We demonstrate that the robustness of LLMs varies significantly over different datasets, and that high-quality LLM-generated features can improve prediction performance by up to 10.52%. This work opens a new direction for assessing and enhancing the reliability of LLM-driven feature engineering.

Multi-level Diagnosis and Evaluation for Robust Tabular Feature Engineering with Large Language Models

World models have been widely utilized in robotics, gaming, and auto-driving. However, their applications on natural language tasks are relatively limited. In this paper, we construct the dialogue world model, which could predict the user's emotion, sentiment, and intention, and future utterances. By defining a POMDP, we argue emotion, sentiment and intention can be modeled as the user belief and solved by maximizing the information bottleneck. By this user belief modeling, we apply the model-based reinforcement learning framework to the dialogue system, and propose a framework called DreamCUB. Experiments show that the pretrained dialogue world model can achieve state-of-the-art performances on emotion classification and sentiment identification, while dialogue quality is also enhanced by joint training of the policy, critic and dialogue world model. Further analysis shows that this manner holds a reasonable exploration-exploitation balance and also transfers well to out-of-domain scenarios such as empathetic dialogues.

Dream to Chat: Model-based Reinforcement Learning on Dialogues with User Belief Modeling

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities and are widely applied in event forecasting. However, studies have demonstrated that LLMs exhibit human-like cognitive biases, systematic patterns of deviation from rationality in decision-making. To explore the cognitive biases in event forecasting, we introduce CogForecast, a human-curated dataset comprising six topics. Experimental results on three LLMs reveal significant cognitive biases in LLM-based event forecasting methods. To address this issue, we propose MCA, a Multi-Cognition Agentic framework. Specifically, MCA leverages LLMs to act as multi-cognition event participants, performing perspective-taking based on the cognitive patterns of event participants to alleviate the inherent cognitive biases in LLMs and offer diverse analytical perspectives. Then, MCA clusters agents according to their predictions and derives a final answer through a group-level reliability scoring method. Experimental results on a dataset including eight event categories demonstrate the effectiveness of MCA. Using Llama-3.1-70B, MCA achieves an accuracy of 82.3% (79.5% for the human crowd). Additionally, we demonstrate that MCA can alleviate the cognitive biases in LLMs and investigate three influencing factors. Our code and dataset will be publicly released.

Beyond Inherent Cognition Biases in LLM-Based Event Forecasting: A Multi-Cognition Agentic Framework

Peer review is essential for maintaining academic quality, but the increasing volume of submissions places a significant burden on reviewers. Large language models (LLMs) offer potential assistance in this process, yet their susceptibility to textual adversarial attacks raises reliability concerns. This paper investigates the robustness of LLMs used as automated reviewers in the presence of such attacks. We focus on three key questions: (1) The effectiveness of LLMs in generating reviews compared to human reviewers. (2) The impact of adversarial attacks on the reliability of LLM-generated reviews. (3) Challenges and potential mitigation strategies for LLM-based review. Our evaluation reveals significant vulnerabilities, as text manipulations can distort LLM assessments. We offer a comprehensive evaluation of LLM performance in automated peer reviewing and analyze its robustness against adversarial attacks. Our findings emphasize the importance of addressing adversarial risks to ensure AI strengthens, rather than compromises, the integrity of scholarly communication.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

David vs. Goliath: Cost-Efficient Financial QA via Cascaded Multi-Agent Reasoning