China

Large Language Models store extensive factual knowledge acquired during large-scale pre-training. However, this knowledge is inherently static, reflecting only the state of the world at the time of training. Knowledge editing has emerged as a promising solution for updating outdated or incorrect facts without full retraining. However, most existing locate-and-edit methods primarily focus on token-level likelihood optimization without addressing semantic coherence. Our analysis reveals that such edited knowledge is often encoded as isolated residual streams in the model&#39;s latent space, distinct from pre-existing knowledge and bypassing natural reasoning process. To address this, we propose STEAM, a semantic-level knowledge editing framework that enhances integration of updated knowledge into the model&#39;s knowledge structure. STEAM first identifies target representations as semantic anchors for the updated factual association, then guides the internal representation of the edited fact towards these anchors through an alignment loss during optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that STEAM improves model’s ability to reason with edited knowledge and enhances semantic coherence, underscoring the importance of latent-space alignment for reliable and coherent knowledge editing.

EMNLP 2025

STEAM: A Semantic-Level Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models

semantic alignment

knowledge editing

latent space

Large Language Models store extensive factual knowledge acquired during large-scale pre-training. However, this knowledge is inherently static, reflecting only the state of the world at the time of training. Knowledge editing has emerged as a promising solution for updating outdated or incorrect facts without full retraining. However, most existing locate-and-edit methods primarily focus on token-level likelihood optimization without addressing semantic coherence. Our analysis reveals that such edited knowledge is often encoded as isolated residual streams in the model's latent space, distinct from pre-existing knowledge and bypassing natural reasoning process. To address this, we propose STEAM, a semantic-level knowledge editing framework that enhances integration of updated knowledge into the model's knowledge structure. STEAM first identifies target representations as semantic anchors for the updated factual association, then guides the internal representation of the edited fact towards these anchors through an alignment loss during optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that STEAM improves model’s ability to reason with edited knowledge and enhances semantic coherence, underscoring the importance of latent-space alignment for reliable and coherent knowledge editing.

poster

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community."<br>

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

[**Link to Conference Handbook**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1johU5QqVVYO4RfH7QcIORr7qrVBdzdwC/view?usp=sharing)





<br>

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Personalized Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in diverse applications, where they are assigned a specific persona—such as a happy high school teacher—to guide their responses. While prior research has examined how well LLMs adhere to predefined personas in writing style, a comprehensive analysis of consistency across different personas and task types is lacking. In this paper, we introduce a new standardized framework to analyze consistency in persona-assigned LLMs. We define consistency as the extent to which a model maintains coherent responses when assigned the same persona across different tasks and runs. Our framework evaluates personas across four different categories (happiness, occupation, personality, and political stance) spanning multiple task dimensions (survey writing, essay generation, social media post generation, single turn, and multi-turn conversations). Our findings reveal that consistency is influenced by multiple factors, including the assigned persona, stereotypes, and model design choices. Consistency also varies across tasks, increasing with more structured tasks and additional context. All code is available on GitHub.

Are Economists Always More Introverted? Analyzing Consistency in Persona-Assigned LLMs

Retrieving entity knowledge that aligns with user intent is essential for task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems to support personalization and localization, especially under large-scale knowledge bases. However, generative models tend to suffer from implicit association preference, while retrieval-generation approaches face knowledge transfer discrepancies. To address these challenges, we propose CaTER, a Context-aware Topology Entity Retrieval Contrastive Learning Framework. CaTER introduces a cycle context-aware distilling attention mechanism, which employs context-independent sparse pooling to suppress noise from weakly relevant attributes. We further construct topologically hard negative samples by decoupling entity information from generated responses and design a topology entity retrieval contrastive loss to train the retriever by reverse distillation. Extensive experiments on three standard TOD benchmarks with both small and large-scale knowledge bases show that CaTER consistently outperforms strong baselines such as MAKER and MK-TOD, achieving state-of-the-art performance in TOD system.

CaTER: A Framework for Context-aware Topology Entity Retrieval Contrastive Learning in End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various tasks. However, the internal mechanisms by which they interpret and integrate cross-modal information remain insufficiently understood. In this paper, to address the limitations of prior studies that could only identify neurons corresponding to single-token and rely on the vocabulary of LLMs, we propose a novel method to identify multimodal neurons in Transformer-based MLLMs. Then we introduce fuzzy set theory to model the complex relationship between neurons and semantic concepts and to characterize how multiple neurons collaboratively contribute to semantic concepts. Through both theoretical analysis and empirical validation, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method and present some meaningful findings. Furthermore, by modulating neuron activation values based on the constructed fuzzy sets, we enhance performance on the Visual Question Answering (VQA) task, showing the practical value of our approach in downstream applications in MLLMs.

Attribution and Application of Multiple Neurons in Multimodal Large Language Models

Current LLMs are trained to refuse potentially harmful input queries regardless of whether users actually had harmful intents, causing a tradeoff between safety and user experience. Through a study of 480 participants evaluating 3,840 query-response pairs, we examine how different refusal strategies affect user perceptions across varying motivations. Our findings reveal that response strategy largely shapes user experience, while actual user motivation has negligible impact. Partial compliance---providing general information without actionable details---emerges as the optimal strategy, reducing negative user perceptions by over 50% to flat-out refusals. Complementing this, we analyze response patterns of 9 state-of-the-art LLMs and evaluate how 6 reward models score different refusal strategies, demonstrating that models rarely deploy partial compliance naturally and reward models currently undervalue it. This work demonstrates that effective guardrails require focusing on crafting thoughtful refusals rather than detecting intent, offering a path toward AI safety mechanisms that ensure both safety and sustained user engagement.

Let Them Down Easy! Contextual Effects of LLM Guardrails on User Perceptions and Preferences

Large language models are increasingly tailored to individual users, responding to differences in preferences, values, goals, and communication styles. In order to assess whether a model can meet the needs of diverse individuals, a foundational requirement is the ability to evaluate whether it can accurately infer and internally represent user-specific traits. We introduce MTPA, a Multitask Personalization Assessment benchmark, designed to test whether models can accurately infer user traits from partial profiles. Compiled from large-scale survey data, MTPA defines a set of trait prediction tasks across beliefs, values, and demographic attributes. MTPA evaluates whether models can accurately infer user traits from partial profiles and quantifies performance across diverse user subgroups. We then evaluate the contribution of trait inference to personalized text generation and empirically validate the relevance of trait inference for downstream alignment. Alongside the benchmark, we release a dataset, toolkit, and baseline evaluations. MTPA is designed with extensibility and sustainability in mind: as the underlying survey datasets are regularly updated, MTPA supports regular integration of new populations and user traits.

MPTA: MultiTask Personalization Assessment

Aligning small language models with human preferences is challenging, as weak policies struggle to generate informative on-policy samples and suffer from unstable gradients when trained on off-policy signals from stronger models. In this work, we propose ReAlign, a training framework that combines the stability of on-policy learning with the guidance of reviser-assisted supervision. In the ReAlign, we first train a lightweight reviser to improve policy-generated responses using preference-based supervision, conditioned on both the prompt and the initial output. And then, the policy is optimized using a combination of standard on-policy preference pairs and reviser-enhanced pairs constructed as a structured revision task, where the latter provide richer, more learnable feedback. Experimental results on AlpacaEval-2 and Arena-Hard demonstrate that ReAlign significantly boosts alignment performance for weak policies, outperforming strong preference optimization baselines.

ReAlign: Structured Revision for Small Language Model Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong task-specific capabilities through fine-tuning, but merging multiple fine-tuned models often leads to degraded performance due to overlapping instruction-following components. Task Arithmetic (TA), which combines task vectors derived from fine-tuning, enables multi-task learning and task forgetting but struggles to isolate task-specific knowledge from general instruction-following behavior. To address this, we propose Layer-Aware Task Arithmetic (LATA), a novel approach that assigns layer-specific weights to task vectors based on their alignment with instruction-following or task-specific components. By amplifying task-relevant layers and attenuating instruction-following layers, LATA improves task learning and forgetting performance while preserving overall model utility. Experiments on multiple benchmarks, including WikiText-2, GSM8K, and HumanEval, demonstrate that LATA outperforms existing methods in both multi-task learning and selective task forgetting, achieving higher task accuracy and alignment with minimal degradation in output quality. Our findings highlight the importance of layer-wise analysis in disentangling task-specific and general-purpose knowledge, offering a robust framework for efficient model merging and editing.

Layer-Aware Task Arithmetic: Disentangling Task-Specific and Instruction-Following Knowledge

Clinical interviews are a standard method for assessing depression. Recent approaches have improved prediction accuracy by focusing on specific questions posed by the interviewer and manually selected question-answer (QA) pairs that target mental health content. However, these methods often neglect the broader conversational context, resulting in limited generalization and reduced robustness, particularly in less structured interviews, which are common in real-world clinical settings. In this work, we develop a multimodal dialogue-level transformer that captures the dynamics of dialogue within each interview by using a combination of sequential positional embedding and question context vectors. In addition to the depression prediction branch, we build an adversarial classifier with a gradient reversal layer to learn shared representations that remain invariant to the types of questions asked during the interview. This approach aims to reduce biased learning and improve the fairness and generalizability of depression detection in diverse clinical interview scenarios. Classification and regression experiments conducted on three real-world interview-based datasets and one synthetic dataset demonstrate the robustness and generalizability of our model.

Mitigating Interviewer Bias in Multimodal Depression Detection: An Approach with Adversarial Learning and Contextual Positional Encoding

Cross-lingual chain-of-thought prompting techniques have proven effective for investigating diverse reasoning paths in Large Language Models (LLMs), especially for low-resource languages. Despite these empirical gains, the mechanisms underlying cross-lingual improvements remain perplexing. This study, therefore, addresses whether the benefits of cross-lingual prompting arise from language-specific reasoning structures intrinsic to each language, or are simply a consequence of improved comprehension through cross-linguistic exposure. We employ neuron intervention and perturbation techniques to analyze and deactivate language-specific reasoning neurons during cross-lingual prompting, leading to performance disparities across languages, up to 27.4\%. Our findings disentangle that these neurons are essential for reasoning in their respective languages, but have minimal effect on reasoning in other languages, providing evidence for the existence of language-specific local reasoning structures and guiding the development of more interpretable and effective multilingual AI systems.

Disentangling Language Understanding and Reasoning Structures in Cross-lingual Chain-of-Thought Prompting

Recent studies show the promise of large language models (LLMs) for few-shot tabular classification but highlight challenges due to the variability in structured data. To address this, we propose distilling data into actionable insights to enable robust and effective classification by LLMs. Drawing inspiration from human learning processes, we introduce InsightTab, an insight distillation framework guided by principles of divide-and-conquer, easy-first, and reflective learning. Our approach integrates rule summarization, strategic exemplification, and insight reflection through deep collaboration between LLMs and data modeling techniques. The obtained insights enable LLMs to better align their general knowledge and capabilities with the particular requirements of specific tabular tasks. We extensively evaluate InsightTab on nine datasets. The results demonstrate consistent improvement over state-of-the-art methods. Ablation studies further validate the principle-guided distillation process, while analyses emphasize InsightTab's effectiveness in leveraging labeled data and managing bias.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

Are Economists Always More Introverted? Analyzing Consistency in Persona-Assigned LLMs