United States

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer inference-time memory bottlenecks dominated by the attention Key-Value (KV) cache, which scales with model size and context length. While KV-cache quantization alleviates this cost, bit allocation between keys and values is often tuned heuristically, lacking theoretical grounding and generalizability. This paper proposes two theorems that anchor mixed-precision KV quantization in the intrinsic geometry of Transformer models. First, key weight matrices systematically have larger spectral and Frobenius norms than value matrices, implying higher information density along the key path. Second, for any given memory budget, prioritizing precision for keys over values strictly reduces quantization error and better preserves accuracy. Empirical evaluations across various prominent LLMs and benchmarks show that key-favored allocations (e.g., 4-bit keys, 2-bit values) retain up to 98.3% accuracy compared to uniform allocations (e.g., 4-bit for both), while conserving memory. These results transform bit allocation from ad hoc tuning into a theoretically grounded, geometry-driven design principle for efficient LLM inference. Source code is available at https://github.com/mohsenhariri/spectral-kv.

ACL 2026

 Quantize What Counts: More for Keys, Less for Values

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

poster

Cooking recipes are complex procedures that require not only a fluent and factual text, but also accurate timing, temperature, and procedural coherence, as well as the correct composition of ingredients. Standard training procedures are primarily based on cross-entropy and focus solely on fluency. Building on RECIPE-NLG, we investigate the use of several composite objectives and present a new topological loss that represents ingredient lists as point clouds in embedding space, minimizing the divergence between predicted and gold ingredients. Using both standard NLG metrics and recipe-specific metrics, we find that our loss significantly improves ingredient- and action-level metrics. Meanwhile, the Dice loss excels in time/temperature precision, and the mixed loss yields competitive trade-offs with synergistic gains in quantity and time. A human preference analysis supports our finding, showing our model is preferred in 62% of the cases.

Losses that Cook: Topological Optimal Transport for Structured Recipe Generation

Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for automated code repair but often struggle with the complex semantic and structural correctness required. We present SynthFix, a hybrid neural-symbolic framework that improves LLM-based vulnerability repair by unifying code synthesis with compiler-informed symbolic feedback. The core of our approach is an adaptive training strategy where a neural Router Model directs code samples to either Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) to learn common patterns or Reward Fine-Tuning (RFT) with symbolic rewards for complex, iterative refinement. On the FixJS (JavaScript) and CodeFlaws (C) benchmarks, SynthFix achieves up to 18% relative improvement in CodeBLEU/CrystalBLEU and 32% in Exact Match over strong SFT and RFT baselines. Our results show that this adaptive combination of training strategies, which mirrors how developers alternate between pattern application and tool feedback, significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-based vulnerability repair. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/CoderDoge1108/SynthFix.

SynthFix: Adaptive Neuro-Symbolic Code Vulnerability Repair

The transition to end-to-end Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has positioned these architectures as active social evaluators in high-stakes domains. However, it remains unclear whether these models maintain objective auditory perception or succumb to the "Hearing with Eyes" phenomenon, where visual racial cues distort linguistic proficiency evaluations. We investigate this cross-modal bias by constructing a controlled counterfactual dataset utilizing a Visual Matched-Guise Paradigm. By pairing identical native audio with diverse visual personas across English and Korean contexts, we reveal a distinct Cultural Asymmetry in model behavior. In Anglophone settings, most closed models exhibit Reverse Linguistic Stereotyping, hallucinating non-native accents for Asian speakers despite standard native audio. Conversely, in Korean settings, the same models assign baseline-relative competence premiums across all visual personas, with the largest gains for out-group (White/Black) speakers, consistent with Expectancy Violation Theory. Our findings demonstrate that MLLMs do not merely process sensory inputs but actively reproduce context-dependent sociolinguistic ideologies.

Visual Interference in Speech Evaluation: Cultural Asymmetry and Cross-Modal Bias in MLLMs

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as scalable tools for mental health counseling, yet evaluating their safety remains challenging due to the interactional and context-dependent nature of clinical harm. Existing evaluation frameworks predominantly assess isolated responses using coarse-grained taxonomies or static datasets, limiting their ability to diagnose how harms emerge and accumulate over multi-turn counseling interactions. In this work, we introduce R-MHSafe, a role-aware mental health safety taxonomy that characterizes clinically significant harm in terms of the interactional roles an AI counselor adopts, including perpetrator, instigator, facilitator, or enabler, combined with clinically grounded harm categories. Then, we propose MHSafeEval, a closed-loop, agent-based evaluation framework that formulates safety assessment as trajectory-level discovery of harm through adversarial multi-turn interactions, guided by role-aware modeling. Using R-MHSafe and MHSafeEval, we conduct a large-scale evaluation across state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results reveal substantial role-dependent and cumulative safety failures that are systematically missed by existing static benchmarks, and show that our framework significantly improves failure-mode coverage and diagnostic granularity.

MHSafeEval: Role-Aware Interaction-Level Evaluation of Mental Health Safety in Large Language Models

Unit test generation has become a promising and important use case for Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation benchmarks for LLM unit test generation primarily focus on function- or class-level code (single-file) rather than on more practical, challenging multi-file codebases.
To address this limitation, we propose \textbf{MultiFileTest}, a multi-file-level benchmark for unit test generation covering Python, Java, and JavaScript. MultiFileTest features 20 high-quality, moderate-sized projects per language. We evaluate eleven frontier LLMs on MultiFileTest, and the results show that most tested LLMs exhibit moderate performance on MultiFileTest, highlighting the benchmark's inherent difficulty.
We also conduct a thorough error analysis, which shows that even advanced LLMs, such as Gemini 3.0 Pro, exhibit basic yet critical errors, including executability and cascade errors. Motivated by this observation, we further evaluate these frontier LLMs under manual error-fixing and self-error-fixing scenarios to assess their potential when equipped with error-fixing mechanisms.
Our dataset is available at 
\href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/yibowang214/MultiFileTest}{MultiFileTest}.

MultiFileTest: A Multi-File-Level LLM Unit Test Generation Benchmark and Impact of Error Fixing Mechanisms

The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow user instructions is central to their reliability, safety, and usefulness. While prior studies assess instruction adherence in the model’s main responses, we argue that it is also critical for large reasoning models (LRMs) to follow user instructions throughout their reasoning process. Reasoning instruction following makes LRMs more controllable and transparent, while reducing risks of undesirable shortcuts, hallucinations, or reward hacking within reasoning traces. To evaluate this dimension, we introduce ReasonIF, a systematic benchmark for assessing reasoning instruction following. ReasonIF includes six categories of instruction prompts, spanning multilingual reasoning, and length control. Across many open-source LRMs including GPT-OSS, Qwen3, and DeepSeek-R1, we find substantial failures in reasoning instruction adherence: the highest instruction following score (IFS) remains below 0.25, meaning that fewer than 25% of reasoning traces comply with the given instructions. Notably, as task difficulty increases, reasoning instruction following degrades further. We also explore two strategies to enhance reasoning instruction fidelity: (1) multi-turn reasoning and (2) Reasoning Instruction Finetuning (RIF) using synthetic data. RIF improves the IFS of GPT-OSS-20B from 0.11 to 0.27, indicating measurable progress but leaving ample room for improvement. We hope this work draws attention to reasoning-level instruction adherence as an underexplored but critical aspect of model alignment, and helps pave the way toward more controllable, interpretable, and trustworthy reasoning models.

ReasonIF: Large Reasoning Models Fail to Follow Instructions During Reasoning

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have emerged as an effective approach for scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) by activating only a subset of experts during inference. Despite their computational efficiency, MoE models incur a substantial memory bottleneck from maintaining all expert parameters during inference. To address this challenge, numerous MoE pruning methods have been proposed. However, most existing methods adopt uniform pruning across layers, which fails to capture layer-wise variations in expert importance and redundancy. In this paper, we propose COmpensated MoE Pruning with Expert-Layer distribution (COMPEL). COMPEL performs layer-adaptive expert pruning by estimating expert importance using Fisher information and deriving layer importance from layer-wise outlier distributions, enabling pruning decisions that capture layer-wise heterogeneity. Furthermore, to mitigate performance degradation resulting from expert pruning, we propose a Fisher information guided expert weight compensation method. Experimental results on the Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B achieve near lossless performance at 25% expert pruning and maintains performance within a 4% margin even at 50% pruning. Moreover, COMPEL consistently outperforms existing pruning methods while substantially reducing inference latency and peak GPU memory usage.

 COMPEL: Compensated Mixture-of-Experts Pruning with Expert-Layer distribution

Large Language Models often struggle with complex, multi-step operational tasks because they remain static during inference and cannot learn from past experience. To address this, we propose MUSE, a framework that enables iterative self-improvement through a hierarchical Memory Module. MUSE organizes cross-domain insights to facilitate the orchestration of long-horizon workflows. The core of our approach is an autonomous post-execution critique mechanism: after completing each sub-task, the system analyzes its operational logs and distills raw execution data into structured, reusable knowledge. This allows the agent to evolve dynamically rather than relying on fixed parameters. Evaluated on the rigorous TAC productivity benchmark, MUSE achieves new state-of-the-art results, significantly outperforming previous methods using only the streamlined Gemini-2.5 Flash model. Our analysis demonstrates that MUSE’s performance scales with the accumulation of insights and exhibits strong cross-task transferability, marking a key step toward autonomous systems capable of lifelong learning in professional environments. Demo videos can be found in our supplementary materials.

Towards Self-Evolving Agents: Enabling Autonomy through Interactive Experience Refinement

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making across diverse domains. Ensuring the generation of safe and reliable responses is critical for the effective deployment of LLM-based applications, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance. Most of these applications typically use carefully crafted prompts to guide response generation; however, the relationship between prompts and the reliability of LLM-generated responses is not yet fully understood. To address this gap, we propose a novel prompt-response concept model that explains the relationship between the amount of task-relevant information (informativeness) provided in the prompt and the LLM-generated response uncertainty by identifying four sources of response uncertainty: prompt underspecification, model quality, task variability, and semantic redundancy. We prove that response uncertainty decreases as prompt informativeness or model quality increases, mirroring the behavior of epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic models. Our experimental results on real-world datasets further validate our proposed model and corroborate the theoretical results.

Prompting the Unknown: Understanding Response Uncertainty in Large Language Models

Prior work has shown that instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) are less well calibrated than their base pre-trained counterparts. However, little is known about the frequently used chat template’s effect on the calibration of conversational LLMs. In this work, we investigate the mechanisms driving this miscalibration by decoupling the effects of the post-training algorithm and the chat format. We find that, while instruction tuning fundamentally harms calibration, the chat template aggravates the issue through an “ownership bias” – models are significantly more confident in their *own* answers than in identical answers provided by a user. Extensive experiments across six recent open-weight LLMs, three benchmarks, and three confidence elicitation methods show that models assign up to 26% higher confidence to their own responses. Leveraging this insight, we propose a simple inference-time strategy: framing the model's answer as user input during confidence elicitation. This approach significantly reduces overconfidence and improves calibration by up to 26% without the need for retraining, narrowing the gap between base and instruction-tuned models.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Losses that Cook: Topological Optimal Transport for Structured Recipe Generation

Similar lecture

MixKVQ: Query-Aware Mixed-Precision KV Cache Quantization for Long-Context Reasoning